Syrian Crisis Simplified for Western Dummies

image - middle east geopolitics simplified
If you want to understand the crisis in Syria you better look at the bigger picture of the Middle East geopolitical situation

‘When there’s no clear goal of a covert operation, analytics in the intelligence agencies point the fingers to the Americans’ aka ‘Creative Chaos’. This would she’d some lights on the Syrian Crisis and by extension to the whole Middle East.

Advertisment

The people of the Middle East know much better how to simplify the situation in there countries once they rightfully categorize the Western powers as criminal foes and the Eastern powers as accomplice opportunists. But the following was posted as a comment on a Facebook post by Mr. James W. Gunn as Western Mainstream media tend to explain it to their audience.

image - middle east geopolitics simplified
If you want to understand the crisis in Syria you better look at the bigger picture of the Middle East geopolitical situation

‘Thought you would gain further clarity on what you do without wanting to cause any sort of confusion…

READ THE FOLLOWING highly restricted briefing document on Syria….

President Assad (who is bad) is a nasty guy who got so nasty his people rebelled and the Rebels (who are good) started winning (hurrah!).

But then some of the rebels turned a bit nasty and are now called Islamic State (who are definitely bad!) and some continued to support democracy (who are still good.)

Arab Spring
Arab ‘Spring’ Found

So President Putin (who is bad, cos he invaded Crimea and the Ukraine and killed lots of folks including that nice Russian man in London with Polonium poisoned sushi) has decided to back Assad (who is still bad) by attacking ISIS (who are also bad) which is sort of a good thing?

But Putin (still bad) thinks the Syrian Rebels (who are good) are also bad, and so he bombs them too, much to the annoyance of the Americans (who are good) who are busy backing and arming the rebels (who are also good).

Now Iran (who used to be bad, but now they have agreed not to build any nuclear weapons and bomb Israel are now good) are going to provide ground troops to support Assad (still bad) as are the Russians (bad) who now have ground troops and aircraft in Syria.

So a Coalition of Assad (still bad) Putin (extra bad) and the Iranians (good, but in a bad sort of way) are going to attack IS (who are bad) which is a good thing, but also the Syrian Rebels (who are good) which is bad.

Now the British (obviously good, except that nice Mr Corbyn in the corduroy jacket, who is probably bad) and the Americans (also good) cannot attack Assad (still bad) for fear of upsetting Putin (bad) and Iran (good/bad) and now they have to accept that Assad might not be that bad after all compared to IS (who are super bad).

So Assad (bad) is now probably good, being better than IS (but let’s face it, drinking your own wee is better than IS so no real choice there) and since Putin and Iran are also fighting IS that may now make them Good.

America (still Good) will find it hard to arm a group of rebels being attacked by the Russians for fear of upsetting Mr Putin (now good) and that nice mad Ayatollah in Iran (also Good) and so they may be forced to say that the Rebels are now Bad, or at the very least abandon them to their fate. This will lead most of them to flee to Turkey and on to Europe or join IS (still the only constantly bad group).

To Sunni Muslims, an attack by Shia Muslims (Assad and Iran) backed by Russians will be seen as something of a Holy War, and the ranks of IS will now be seen by the Sunnis as the only Jihadis fighting in the Holy War and hence many Muslims will now see IS as Good (Doh!.)

Sunni Muslims will also see the lack of action by Britain and America in support of their Sunni rebel brothers as something of a betrayal (mmmm might have a point) and hence we will be seen as Bad.

So now we have America (now bad) and Britain (also bad) providing limited support to Sunni Rebels (bad) many of whom are looking to IS (Good / bad) for support against Assad (now good) who, along with Iran (also Good) and Putin (also, now, unbelievably, Good) are attempting to retake the country Assad used to run before all this started?

I hope that clears up all that confusion for you! If it doesn’t, sorry you’ll have to find someone else to explain it a different way.’

Thank you Mr. James W. Gunn for the explanation, the only constantly thing in all this is the Western citizens willfully being fooled by their politicians through their trusted mainstream media into becoming accomplice criminals in the suffering of the people of the Middle East by fueling the real evil and terrorist groups, also terrorist states, against people whom never paused any threat to them in the West, even the worst terrorist attacks against western interests were carried out by terrorist groups created by the Western powers themselves to use them to further their goals on the account of the people in the Middle East, it only backfires based on the laws of physics, among other laws.

wpid-wmd.jpg
WMDS- Weapons of Mass Deception
Advertisment

1 Comment

  1. If the whole story was not that dramatic for the peopleof syria, one only could laugh all day about the fools that still follow the media and politicians.

Comments are closed.